MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402677380 · doi:10.3390/a17090420

An Algorithm to Find the Shortest Path through Obstacles of Arbitrary Shapes and Positions in 2D

2024· article· en· W4402677380 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Labonté

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShortest path problemPath (computing)AlgorithmComputer scienceShortest Path Faster AlgorithmK shortest path routingYen's algorithmMathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical optimizationDijkstra's algorithmGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm is described to find the shortest route through a field of obstacles of arbitrary shapes and positions. It has the appreciable advantage of not having to find mathematical formulas to represent the obstacles: it works directly with a digital image of the terrain and is implemented solely with standard graphical functions. Key to this algorithm is the definition of digraphs, the edges of which are built with obstacle bitangents and border enveloping convex arcs that incorporate the fundamental features of shortest paths. These graphs have a remarkably lower cardinality than those that have been proposed before to solve this problem; their edges are a concatenation of sequences of what individual edges and nodes are in formerly defined graphs. Furthermore, a thorough analysis of the topology of the terrain yields a procedure to eliminate the edges that have no possibility of being part of the shortest path. The A* graph optimization algorithm is adapted to deal with this type of graph. A new quite general theorem is proved, which applies to all graphs in which the triangle inequality holds, which allows the discarding of one of the normal steps of the A* algorithm. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated by calculating the shortest path for real complex terrains of areas between 25 km2 and 900 km2. In all cases, the required calculation time is less than 0.6 s on a Core i7-10750H CPU @ 2.60 GHz laptop computer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlgorithmsSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207