MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402687880 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-4247

New NRC Snow Test Environment Part 1 System Capabilities and Characteristics

2024· article· en· W4402687880 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Fuleki, Nick Doiron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowComputer scienceTest (biology)System testingEnvironmental scienceSystems engineeringReliability engineeringEngineeringGeologySoftware engineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this work was to develop and characterize a new artificial snow making system at NRC to produce a simulated falling snow environment meeting the specifications setup by the industry members of the Ice Genesis project. This system was first tested in the summer of 2021 at the Gas Turbine Lab (GTL) Research Altitude Test Facility (RATFac) and then upgraded for a second test campaign from July to September 2022. Snow-like particles are created by agglomerating ice particles from the NRC ice crystal icing (ICI) system, and then injected into the cascade rig icing tunnel. This type of particle is consistent with observations in nature where the most prevalent category of falling snow particle is aggregates. A range of system operating parameters were evaluated to examine the range of test conditions that could be achieved and were in good agreement with that observed in nature. This paper focuses on characterizing the artificial snow environment and Part 2 examines the accretion characteristics in this environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207