MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402687986 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-3777

Ice Crystal Environment Modular Axial Compressor Rig: Modeling of Ice and Air Conditions

2024· article· en· W4402687986 on OpenAlexaffabout
Craig R. Davison, Martin Neuteboom, Jeanne G. Mason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designGas compressorIce crystalsIce formationAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringGeologyMeteorologyPhysicsAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Research Council Canada (NRC) Ice Crystal Environment Modular Axial Compressor Rig (ICE-MACR) physically simulates the conditions in a gas turbine compressor in altitude icing wind tunnels for performing ice accretion tests. This allows significantly more instrumentation and monitoring than could be achieved on a real engine, and allows test conditions to be well controlled. However, the mixed phase environment (ice, liquid and vapour water, and air) makes measurements during the accretion tests challenging. To better understand the accretion results experimental data is supplemented by a 1-D numeric model used to calculate air temperature, humidity, water temperature and melt ratio of select accretion test runs. Numeric model results for select test points from the 2023 ICE-MACR campaign are presented. Uncertainties in initial test conditions are also examined to determine if they could have a significant affect on the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207