MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402689117 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-3615

Mesh Optimization for Improved Computational Fluid Dynamics Numerical Stability and Convergence Rate

2024· article· en· W4402689117 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Zandsalimy, Carl Ollivier‐Gooch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Stability (learning theory)Computer scienceRate of convergenceComputational fluid dynamicsMathematical optimizationMathematicsMechanicsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel mesh optimization approach is utilized in conjunction with the Ansys Fluent solver for numerical stability and convergence rate enhancement of computational fluid dynamics simulations. This method leverages the dynamic mode decomposition of solution update vectors for solution mode identification. Through this data reduction technique, the large-scale linear evolution system is mapped onto a smaller space with substantially fewer degrees of freedom for stability analysis at a negligible fraction of the overall computational cost. The eigenanalysis of the small-scale matrix facilitates the identification of dominant solution modes during the simulation. This mesh optimization technique leverages the gradients of the problematic solution modes with respect to local changes of the mesh to calculate proper modification vectors for a small collection of nodes. These modifications lead to the improved numerical stability of the simulation. Employing the Ansys Fluent CFD package as the primary finite-volume solver, our study demonstrates the complete non-invasiveness of the presented mesh optimization approach, requiring no access to the underlying software architecture. The results presented herein illustrate the feasibility and efficacy of this mesh optimization technique in improving numerical stability and convergence rate, showcasing its compatibility with third-party flow solvers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207