MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402690376 · doi:10.29173/topo46

The Israel-Palestine Border Conflict

2024· article· en· W4402690376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gabriella Dunn

Bibliographic record

VenueTopophilia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalestineArab–Israeli conflictAncient historyPolitical scienceHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In my essay, I analyze how boundaries can perpetuate social issues. I specifically dissect the physical boundary created between Israel and Palestine with the use of a separation wall along the West Bank. This was a refection paper for a 300 level Human Geography class, and I relate my essay back to the topics taught throughout the course. Specifically, the topic of social geography and social boundaries. Expanding more within my writing, I discuss how Israel has created a social boundary against Palestine by using a physical one. This also essay covers some of the expansive complexities of this specific issue, as it is disgusting a conflict that has expanded for over six decades. While mentioning the controversies of the Israel and Palestine conflict, my essay mostly discusses the social impacts of the West Bank separation wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopophiliaSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207