MLGCN: an ultra efficient graph convolutional neural model for 3D point cloud analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of 3D acquisition technologies, 3D sensors such as LiDARs, 3D scanners, and RGB-D cameras have become increasingly accessible and cost-effective. These sensors generate 3D point cloud data that require efficient algorithms for tasks such as 3D model classification and segmentation. While deep learning techniques have proven effective in these areas, existing models often rely on complex architectures, leading to high computational costs that are impractical for real-time applications like augmented reality and robotics. In this work, we propose the Multi-level Graph Convolutional Neural Network (MLGCN), an ultra-efficient model for 3D point cloud analysis. The MLGCN model utilizes shallow Graph Neural Network (GNN) blocks to extract features at various spatial locality levels, leveraging precomputed KNN graphs shared across GCN blocks. This approach significantly reduces computational overhead and memory usage, making the model well-suited for deployment on low-memory and low-CPU devices. Despite its efficiency, MLGCN achieves competitive performance in object classification and part segmentation tasks, demonstrating results comparable to state-of-the-art models while requiring up to a thousand times fewer floating-point operations and significantly less storage. The contributions of this paper include the introduction of a lightweight, multi-branch graph-based network for 3D shape analysis, the demonstration of the model's efficiency in both computation and storage, and a thorough theoretical and experimental evaluation of the model's performance. We also conduct ablation studies to assess the impact of different branches within the model, providing valuable insights into the role of specific components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".