MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402693350 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2024.14.0032

Eutrophication Mechanisms and Their Impacts on Coastal Marine Ecosystems

2024· article· en· W4402693350 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenfang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutrophicationMarine ecosystemEnvironmental scienceEcosystemOceanographyEnvironmental resource managementEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eutrophication is a process driven by the excessive input of nutrients, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus, which severely threatens the health of coastal marine ecosystems. With the increase in human activities, eutrophication has become increasingly severe, leading to the depletion of dissolved oxygen and the formation of hypoxic and anoxic zones. These changes have profound impacts on primary producers, species composition, biodiversity, and food web structure. This study systematically reviews the mechanisms of eutrophication and its physical, chemical, and ecological impacts on coastal marine ecosystems, exploring its long-term consequences and discussing mitigation and management strategies. Additionally, by analyzing case studies of coastal eutrophication in both developed and developing countries, this study summarizes effective management experiences and best practices. The significance of this research lies in providing a scientific basis for the development of more effective policies and management strategies, promoting the sustainable development of global coastal ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207