Molecular Interactions between Mosquito Vectors and Pathogens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction between mosquito vectors and pathogens is a key factor in the epidemiology of many infectious diseases, such as dengue, Zika virus, and malaria. Mosquitoes are not only carriers of pathogens, but also an environment in which pathogens can replicate and evolve. Therefore, disrupting the life cycle of pathogens in mosquito vectors can significantly reduce disease transmission. This study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms that control pathogen entry, survival, replication, and transmission in mosquito vectors. By employing a range of molecular tools, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches, as well as advanced technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, we studied how pathogens recognize and bind to host cells, the pathways they use for entry, and their strategies to evade immunity and survive inside cells. This study reveals the potential of new molecular targets for vector control and disease prevention, which could lead to more effective public health interventions and reduce the global burden of mosquito-borne diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".