MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Flexural behavior of digitally-fabricated Through-Tenon connections under bending moments

2024· article· en· W4402696950 on OpenAlexaff
Aryan Rezaei Rad, Amirhossein Heidari, Yves Weinand

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction and Building Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsHudbay Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMortise and tenonFlexural strengthMaterials scienceStructural engineeringBendingBending momentComposite materialThree point flexural testEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of engineered mass timber products in construction and the proliferation of computer numerical control machinery, as a technically feasible and economically justifiable fabrication technique , have given rise to new methods of construction. Inspired by traditional carpentry connections, digital fabrication is harnessed to establish connections between engineered timber panels in freeform systems through interlocking mechanisms, without supplementary metal connectors. This paper characterizes the behavior of digitally-fabricated Through-Tenon connections subjected to bending moments, which are critical in freeform timber plate structures. Six timber specimen groups, made from hardwood Laminated Veneer Lumber , are designed according to material and assembly properties. The moment–rotation behavior of the specimens is documented and evaluated in qualitative (i.e., slip modulus, strength , ductility) and quantitative measures (i.e., damage propagation , failure mode). Overall, the specimens reach their maximum strength soon after yielding occurs regardless of their fiber orientation or assembly pattern. Furthermore, all specimens are classified as having low ductility. The yield and maximum strengths, associated rotations, and joint stiffness depends on the tab assembly vector. For the fiber-perpendicular specimens, the damage modes are independent of the assembly vector. On the other hand, the damage propagation and failure mechanisms strongly depend on the insertion angle for the fiber-parallel specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstruction and Building MaterialsSame topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207