Bibliographic record
Abstract
La perspective de cet article s’inscrit dans une appréhension littéraire d’élément de culture précisément du masque en tant qu’un phénomène culturel qui se rattache fondamentalement à une situation autochtonique. Il s’agit de la figure du Grand Masque, symbole d’une autochtonie ivoirienne. Parce que le masque représente l’une des entités anthropologiques au cœur des interactions entre l’être social et ses besoins, l’œuvre romanesque Le Grand Masque a menti d’Attita Hino offre une visualisation fictionnelle de cet objet culturel. L’objet-masque est récupéré puis inventé. En d’autres termes, l’image du masque se saisit sous le jeu technique de la récupération culturelle et de l’invention littéraire. C’est ainsi que ces procédés rendent comptent de la mobilité et de la transférabilité de la figure du masque partant de sa trajectoire d’objet culturel à l’objet littéraire. Traduire donc, à l’exemple de la représentation romanesque de l’objet-masque, les entours d’une initiative de littérarisation du culturel, voilà la portée de cette contribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".