TBC1D24 regulates mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The RabGAP protein TBC1D24 is mutated in several neurological disorders including DOORS syndrome (Deafness, Onycho-Osteodystrophy, Mental Retardation, Seizures). Although TBC1D24 comprises two highly conserved domains — the Tre2/Bub2/Cdc16 (TBC) domain and the TLDc domain — both of which seem to play critical roles in cellular functions, its exact physiological function within the cell remains poorly understood. Here, we show that TBC1D24 affects mitochondrial structure and activity. Specifically, both primary fibroblasts from patients with TBC1D24 mutations and cells in which TBC1D24 has been knocked down exhibit fragmented mitochondria, decreased ATP production, and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential. Importantly, loss or mutation of TBC1D24 also alters sites of contact between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria (ERMCS). These sites are vital for mitochondrial fusion and fission processes, which regulate mitochondrial dynamics and, consequently, mitochondrial activity. Altogether, our results uncover a new role for TBC1D24 in the regulation of mitochondrial functions and ERMCS which likely contribute to the neurological dysfunction present in affected patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".