Efficacy and safety of therapeutic alpha-1-microglobulin RMC-035 in reducing kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, phase 2a trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Cardiac surgery invariably triggers acute kidney stress causing adverse renal outcomes. The AKITA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of RMC-035, a novel analogue of alpha-1-microglobulin, for reducing cardiac surgery-associated kidney injury. Methods In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2a study, we randomly assigned (1:1) adult hospitalised patients undergoing open-chest cardiac surgery at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) at 21 sites in North America and Europe to receive either RMC-035 (1.3 or 0.65 mg/kg) or placebo (1:1) for 2 days (5 intravenous infusions), stratified by region and renal function. Eligible patients had at least one pre-defined AKI risk factor. Patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were excluded. The co-primary efficacy and safety endpoints were AKI (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes definition) within 72 h after surgery and nature, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included eGFR and Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) up to Day 90. Randomised patients who had received at least one dose of study drug were analysed for primary and safety analyses. Participants, investigators and sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05126303) and EudraCT (2021-004040-19). Findings Patient enrolment was stopped at interim analysis due to futility. Between March 31, 2022 and July 12, 2023, 177 patients (RMC-035: 89, placebo: 88) were randomised and treated. AKI rate for RMC-035 vs placebo was 50.6% (n = 45) and 39.8% (n = 35) (relative risk [RR]: 1.30, 90% confidence interval [90% CI]: 0.99, 1.71; p = 0.12). A short-lived creatinine increase was observed with the higher RMC-035 dose. Treatment with RMC-035 was associated with improved secondary renal outcomes at Day 90: placebo-adjusted eGFR change from baseline 4.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 90% CI 0.51–8.12, p = 0.06; and MAKE 6.7% (n = 6) vs 15.9% (n = 14); RR: 0.41, 90% CI: 0.19, 0.88, p = 0.05. The most frequently reported TEAEs for RMC-035 were chills (30.3%), nausea (21.3%), anaemia (20.2%); and atrial fibrillation (29.5%), anaemia (20.5%), hypervolemia (14.8%) for placebo. The majority of TEAEs in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. In the RMC-035 group, 26 (29.2%) patients experienced at least one severe or life-threatening TEAE and in the placebo group 16 (18.2%) patients. There were 4 deaths per treatment arm (one treatment-related, in placebo group). Interpretation In this proof-of-concept study, RMC-035 did not reduce AKI 72 h after cardiac surgery. Evaluations may have been confounded by a drug-induced transient creatinine increase in a subgroup of patients. RMC-035 was associated with improved secondary renal outcomes. These results merit further investigation and should be interpreted with caution, as the study was not powered for these outcomes. Funding Guard Therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".