MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402718618 · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01119

Life cycle assessment of limestone calcined clay concrete: Potential for low-carbon 3D printing

2024· article· en· W4402718618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable materials and technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsCalcinationCarbon fibersClay mineralsMaterials scienceLife-cycle assessmentMineralogyComposite materialMetallurgyGeologyChemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limestone calcined clay cement is being promoted throughout the construction industry as a way to considerably reduce the cement proportion in concrete mixtures. At the same time, concrete 3D printing could save resources by placing concrete material only where its functionalities are maximized. This study addresses the need for a quantification of the environmental impacts related to the material acquisition phase regarding a low-clinker 3D printing material. Compared to a 30 MPa 3D printing material from the literature, a 3D printable LC3-based concrete with low clinker content in the Quebec context displays a 36 % climate change score reduction with the same compressive strength (46 % reduction in the French context). A small impact shift is noticed in 6 out of 16 midpoint indicators (5 in the French case), mainly due to the calcined clay production. However, it is offset by the significant reduction in other indicators when considering an endpoint assessment. When considering different sourcing scenarios, a global warming potential variability of up to 15 % is observed. LC3 remains a viable solution for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the context of concrete 3D printing as it provides mechanical strength and enhanced structuration rate for low-clinker materials. However, a specific attention should be accorded to the calcined clay plant locations, especially when the calcined clay content is higher than the value used in this study. As a perspective, a mix design tool could allow the optimization of environmental impacts depending on expected fresh and hardened properties. • A printable blend is assessed in the Quebec and French contexts. • LC3 allows a 36 % to 46 % reduction in GWP for concrete 3D printing. • For other indicators, improvements prevail over degradations at the endpoint level. • Calcined clay sourcing induces an LC3 GWP variability of 15 % in the Quebec context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it