MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402721559 · doi:10.61903/gr.2016.201

Fates of the Participants of the 1941 June Uprising in Pušalotas Rural Area of Panevėžys County

2016· article· en· W4402721559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tadas Jaskelevičius

Bibliographic record

VenueGenocidas ir rezistencija · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomicsGeographyArchaeologyAncient historyHistorySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The arrival of the German army to the rural area of Pušalotas marked the end of the June 1941 Uprising. This however, was not the end of anti-Soviet activities of the partisans. They continued to arrest the retreating Soviet soldiers and Soviet activists or other suspects who lived in Pušalotas rural area. While the activities of the former participants of the Uprising were similar to those during the Uprising, they were only possible because they met the needs of the new occupation authorities. The most intensive period of activities of former insurgents was during the first few months of the Nazi occupation. At that time the majority of insurgents operated within the auxiliary squad and police units of the German occupation authorities. In this period, some of them also took part in the killings of the civilian population organised by the occupation authorities. The lack of archival data and the fact that not all information in the documents could be considered reliable prevent from identifying the exact number of such people and their motivation. Eventually the insurgents started to realise that the Nazis did not bring independence to Lithuania. At the end of 1941, anti-German moods became stronger, but did not develop into a more serious resistance movement. The arrival of the Soviet Army to Lithuania in 1944 became another critical moment in the lives of the insurgents. Some of them left Lithuania together with the retreating Germans and later, in the post-war years, settled in West Germany, United States of America, Canada and Australia. Others decided to stay in their home country. Some of the former insurgents joined the partisans in the forests, others were recruited to the Red Army. Arrests of the former participants of the 1941 June Uprising was one of the priorities of the Soviet authorities which occupied Lithuania for the second time. Between 1944 and 1950, the majority of insurgents from Pušalotas rural area were detained. All of them faced criminal charges, but sentences for the same charges varied. Collective liability, where other family members were also sentenced for the person’s crimes, an exclusive phenomenon of the Soviet legal system, was applied. Only in 1990, when Lithuania restored its independence, was it possible to exonerate the participants of the 1941 June Uprising in Pušalotas (except for the persons sentenced for the participation in the massacre of civilians), but only a few lived to see this day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenocidas ir rezistencijaSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207