MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402721881 · doi:10.1094/php-08-24-0080-rs

Known Distribution of the Soybean Cyst Nematode, <i>Heterodera glycines</i> , in the United States and Canada Through 2023

2024· article· en· W4402721881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregory L. Tylka, Christopher C. Marett

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Health Progress · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeteroderaSoybean cyst nematodeBiologyNematodeAgronomyCystNematologyBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN), Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, is a major yield-reducing pathogen of soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merrill) in the United States and Canada, causing twice as much yield loss annually as any other pathogen. Reports of new discoveries of SCN in areas of the United States and Canada that grow the crop can lead to greater awareness of the pathogen and increased efforts to scout for the nematode. Beginning in January 2024, university nematologists, plant pathologists, and agronomists as well as government plant health officials in soybean-producing states in the United States and provinces in Canada were queried about the known distribution of the nematode. This publication contains an updated map of the known distribution of SCN in the United States and Canada through 2023 and a listing of counties and rural municipalities where the nematode initially was identified between 2000 and 2023. In total, there were 31 counties in 10 states in the United States plus three counties total in Manitoba and Ontario and 10 rural municipalities in Quebec, Canada, in which SCN was first discovered between 2020 and 2023. The results show that the distribution of SCN in the United States and Canada continues to expand, and sustained scouting for the presence of the pathogen is warranted to facilitate management to reduce soybean yield losses. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Health ProgressSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207