Muscle recruitment during gait in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation due to trauma compared to able-bodied controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with transfemoral lower limb amputations walk with adapted gait. These kinetic and kinematic compensatory strategies will manifest as differences in muscle recruitment patterns. It is important to characterize these differences to understand the reduced endurance, reduced functionality, and progression of co-morbidities in this population. This study aims to characterize muscle recruitment during gait of highly functional individuals with traumatic transfemoral amputations donning state-of-the-art prosthetics compared to able-bodied controls. Inverse dynamic and static optimisation methods of musculoskeletal modelling were used to quantify muscle forces of the residual and intact limb over a gait cycle for 11 individuals with traumatic transfemoral amputation and for 11 able-bodied controls. Estimates of peak muscle activation and impulse were calculated to assess contraction intensity and energy expenditure. The generalized estimation equation method was used to compare the maximum values of force, peak activation, and impulse of the major muscles. The force exhibited by the residual limb’s iliacus, psoas major, adductor longus, tensor fasciae latae and pectineus is significantly higher than the forces in these muscles of the intact contralateral limb group and the able-bodied control group ( p < 0.001). These muscles appear to be recruited for their flexor moment arm, indicative of the increased demand due to the loss of the plantar flexors. The major hip extensors are recruited to a lesser degree in the residual limb group compared to the intact limb group ( p < 0.001). The plantar flexors of the intact limb appear to compensate for the amputated limb with significantly higher forces compared to the able-bodied controls ( p = 0.01). Significant differences found in impulse and peak activation consisted of higher values for the limbs (residual and/or intact) of individuals with transfemoral lower limb amputations compared to the able-bodied controls, demonstrating an elevated cost of gait. This study highlights asymmetry in hip muscle recruitment between the residual and the intact limb of individuals with transfemoral lower limb amputations. Overall elevated impulse and peak activation in the limbs of individuals with transfemoral amputation, compared to able-bodied controls, may manifest in the reduced walking endurance of this population. This demand should be minimised in rehabilitation protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".