Reflecting on “Beyond the Rainbow”: Advancing 2S/Indigiqueer Health Equity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of 2S/Indigiqueer challenges to health and wellness, a focus that expands how we conceptualize negative colonial impacts to include cultural approaches to health, we potentially open space more helpful for addressing disparities. Four possible pathways are discussed, and include: (1) Expanding social determinants of health to include 2S/Indigiqueer practices that promote health; (2) Cultural resurgence helps address health disparities as it works to strengthen both individuals and communities; (3) To do these well, it is important to understand the cultural diversity that exists across 2S/Indigiqueer communities; and (4) Responses that privilege 2S/Indigiqueer community led-responses are needed to better ground health and wellness programs in culture. Finally, we add to these pathways by advocating for a series of policy responses that are supported on the ground by community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.037 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".