A comprehensive in silico analysis and experimental validation of miRNAs capable of discriminating between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Accurate differentiation between lung adenocarcinoma (AC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is crucial owing to their distinct therapeutic approaches. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exhibit variable expression across subtypes, making them promising biomarkers for discrimination. This study aimed to identify miRNAs with robust discriminatory potential between AC and SCC and elucidate their clinical significance. Methods: MiRNA expression profiles for AC and SCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differential expression analysis and supervised machine learning methods (Support Vector Machine, Decision trees and Naïve Bayes) were employed. Clinical significance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, survival analysis, and correlation with clinicopathological features. Validation was conducted using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, signaling pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were conducted to unveil biological functions. Results: Five miRNAs (miR-205-3p, miR-205-5p, miR-944, miR-375 and miR-326) emerged as potential discriminative markers. The combination of miR-944 and miR-326 yielded an impressive area under the curve of 0.985. RT-qPCR validation confirmed their biomarker potential. miR-326 and miR-375 were identified as prognostic factors in AC, while miR-326 and miR-944 correlated significantly with survival outcomes in SCC. Additionally, exploration of signaling pathways implicated their involvement in key pathways including PI3K-Akt, MAPK, FoxO, and Ras. Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of miRNAs as discriminative markers between AC and SCC, shedding light on their role as prognostic indicators and their association with clinicopathological characteristics. Moreover, it highlights their potential involvement in signaling pathways crucial in non-small cell lung cancer pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".