MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402726381 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-7mnqb

Nano Trees: Nanopore signal processing and sublevel fitting using Decision Trees

2024· preprint· en· W4402726381 on OpenAlexafffund
Deekshant Wadhwa, Philipp Mensing, James L. Harden, Paula Branco, Vincent Tabard‐Cossa, Kyle Briggs

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDecision treeNanoporeSIGNAL (programming language)Nano-Signal processingComputer scienceDecision systemAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceMathematicsNanotechnologyOperations researchComputer hardwareDigital signal processingComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the complexity of solid-state nanopore experiments increases, analysis of the resulting electrical signals to determine biomolecular details becomes a challenge. State of the art techniques for this task perform poorly when transient signal characteristics approach the bandwidth limitations of the measurement electronics. In this work, we address this challenge through an algorithm, called Nano Trees, for fitting piecewise constant functions. Nano Trees leverages machine learning algorithms to provide accurate fits to the noisy piecewise constant data that is characteristic of nanopore ionic current signals, producing accurate fits on transients as short as twice the rise time of the measurement system. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm on several real and synthetic datasets. These findings underscore the generalizability and accuracy of this approach in the regime of fast molecular translocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207