MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402727323 · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02368

TurboSL: Dense, Accurate and Fast 3D by Neural Inverse Structured Light

2024· article· en· W4402727323 on OpenAlexaff
Parsa Mirdehghan, Maxx Wu, Wenzheng Chen, David B. Lindell, Kiriakos N. Kutulakos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInverseArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer graphics (images)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show how to turn a noisy and fragile active triangulation technique-three-pattern structured light with a grayscale camera-into a fast and powerful tool for 3D capture: able to output sub-pixel accurate disparities at megapixel resolution, along with reflectance, normals, and a no-reference estimate of its own pixelwise 3D error. To achieve this, we formulate structured-light decoding as a neural inverse rendering problem. We show that despite having just three or four input images-all from the same viewpoint-this problem can be tractably solved by TurboSL, an algorithm that combines (1) a precise image formation model, (2) a signed distance field scene representation, and (3) projection Pattern sequences optimized for accuracy instead of precision. We use TurboSL to reconstruct a variety of complex scenes from images captured at up to 60 fps with a camera and a common projector. Our experiments highlight TurboSL's potential for dense and highly-accurate 3D acquisition from data captured in fractions of a second.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207