A method for suppressing pH excursion during elution in ion-exchange chromatography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Suppression of pH excursion during elution in cation exchange chromatography. • Simple method involving anion exchange cartridge in series during elution. • Hypothesis of working principle of the above. • Decrease in width of eluted peak. • Potentially greater control on separation and enhanced stability of eluted species. A simple method for reducing pH excursion during salt-induced elution in cation exchange chromatography is presented in this paper. Connecting a preequilibrated anion exchange cartridge in series in front of the cation exchange device just prior to the elution step significantly reduced the transient decrease in pH that is typically observed during elution. The working principle of the proposed method is hypothesized. Bind and elute chromatography experiments showed that the suppression of pH excursion during elution of a monoclonal antibody from a cation exchange chromatography device resulted in significantly sharper and narrower eluted protein peaks. Improvement in pH control during elution would not only result in better reproducibility and efficiency in separation but would also ensure greater stability of pH sensitive proteins during their purification using ion exchange chromatography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".