MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402734682 · doi:10.1016/j.glt.2024.09.002

Interaction effects of mental health disorders and labour productivity on economic growth in Africa

2024· article· en· W4402734682 on OpenAlexaff
Mustapha Immurana, Ibrahim Abdullahi, Kwame Godsway Kisseih, Muniru Azuug, Ayisha Mohammed, Micheal Kofi Boachie, Toby Joseph Mathew Kizhakkekara, Phidelia Theresa Doegah, Maxwell Ayindenaba Dalaba

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Transitions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityMental healthEconomicsLabour economicsDevelopment economicsEconomic growthPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mental health disorders are major public health problems confronting millions of people globally as well as in Africa. While these disorders can negatively affect the economic productivity of affected persons which can reduce economic growth, to the best of our knowledge, empirical evidence in this regard is sparse, with none emanating from the African continent. This study therefore examines the individual and combined (interaction) effects of mental health disorders and labour productivity on economic growth in Africa. The study uses data comprising 45 African countries over the period, 2002–2019. Prevalence of schizophrenia, depression, dysthymia, bipolar and anxiety are the mental health disorders used while the log difference between the current year's real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the past year's real GDP is used to measure economic growth. Labour productivity is measured by the rate of growth in output (GDP) per worker. The system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) regression is used as the estimation technique. The study finds that, in both the short-and long-run periods, while all the mental health disorders have negative significant effects on economic growth, the effect of labour productivity on economic growth is positive and significant. However, the interactions of each of the mental health disorders with labour productivity are found to have negative significant effects on economic growth in both the short-and long-run periods. There is therefore the need to enhance awareness about mental health disorders as well as access to effective and quality mental healthcare to reduce the associated enormous economic losses. • Mental health disorders are major public health problems affecting millions of people globally as well as in Africa. • This study examines the individual and combined (interaction) effects of mental health disorders and labour productivity on economic growth in 45 African countries. • We find that, the interactions of mental health disorders with labour productivity have negative significant effects on economic growth. • There is the need to enhance awareness about mental health disorders as well as access to effective and quality mental healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal TransitionsSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207