MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402735781 · doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.09.002

Comparative organic geochemistry of shale deposits of northern Appalachian Basin

2024· article· en· W4402735781 on OpenAlexaff
Nandini Kar, Kathryn Tamulonis, Richard W. Smith, Stella C. Woodard, Mark R. Noll, Reilly M. Blocho, Andre Brunette, William A. Heins

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
FundersAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundAmerican Chemical Society
KeywordsOil shaleGeochemistryGeologyStructural basinEarth scienceMining engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The organic-rich black shales in the Appalachian basin are a vital producer of natural gas. In this study, we present new multiproxy geochemical data from the Ordovician and Devonian black shales in New York (NY) and Pennsylvania (PA). The samples include outcrop samples collected in NY (Utica Group and Marcellus Formation) and core samples from PA (Marcellus Formation, Skaneateles Formation, and Genesee Group). We combined organic geochemical data (% total organic carbon or %TOC, δ 13 C org , C/N ratio, and lipid n -alkane distribution) with trace element (TE) data to identify the organic matter (OM) sources and depositional conditions. The TE analysis data shows that water conditions were variable during the deposition of these black shales, fluctuating between oxic and dysoxic conditions with occasional anoxia. There was probably a change from an open water condition (Co∗Mn = 0.2) during the deposition of the Flat Creek Formation to a more restricted exchange later during the deposition of the Indian Castle Formation (Co∗Mn = 2.9) in the Ordovician. Basin circulation likely remained restricted during the deposition of the Devonian black shales (Co∗Mn ranges from 0.4 to 1.3). Based on δ 13 C org values (−32.9‰ and −29.6‰) that are more depleted than marine OM δ 13 C org , C/N ratios (11.2 and 9.2) higher than marine OM, and the presence of longer chain n -alkanes in the range of C25 to C33, we suggest that bryophytes were possibly a significant organic source to the Ordovician Utica Group in NY. The kerogen type in Utica Group samples is type III, mostly terrestrial OM. The Devonian NY and PA samples show mostly bimodal distributions. In some samples, a secondary, though sometimes dominant, shorter chain peak in the range of C14 to C20 is present, in addition to the long chain peak. We suggest the bimodal n -alkane distribution signifies a mixed OM source consisting of terrestrial and marine contributions with differing degrees of thermal maturation compared to the samples with a unimodal distribution. Our results suggest that samples from the NY Marcellus Group are composed of type III kerogen, while samples from the PA Marcellus Formation, Skaneateles Formation, and Genesee Group contain both type II and type III kerogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetroleum ResearchSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207