Phase-change ultrasound contrast agents for proton range verification: towards an in vivo application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. In proton therapy, range uncertainties prevent optimal benefit from the superior depth-dose characteristics of proton beams over conventional photon-based radiotherapy. To reduce these uncertainties we recently proposed the use of phase-change ultrasound contrast agents as an affordable and effective range verification tool. In particular, superheated nanodroplets can convert into echogenic microbubbles upon proton irradiation, whereby the resulting ultrasound contrast relates to the proton range with high reproducibility. Here, we provide a first in vivo proof-of-concept of this technology. Approach. First, the in vitro biocompatibility of radiation-sensitive poly(vinyl alcohol) perfluorobutane nanodroplets was investigated using several colorimetric assays. Then, in vivo ultrasound contrast was characterized using acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) and later using proton beam irradiations at varying energies (49.7 MeV and 62 MeV) in healthy Sprague Dawley rats. A preliminary evaluation of the in vivo biocompatibility was performed using ADV and a combination of physiology monitoring and histology. Main results. Nanodroplets were non-toxic over a wide concentration range (<1 mM). In healthy rats, intravenously injected nanodroplets primarily accumulated in the organs of the reticuloendothelial system, where the lifetime of the generated ultrasound contrast (<30 min) was compatible with a typical radiotherapy fraction (<5 min). Spontaneous droplet vaporization did not result in significant background signals. Online ultrasound imaging of the liver of droplet-injected rats demonstrated an energy-dependent proton response, which can be tuned by varying the nanodroplet concentration. However, caution is warranted when deciding on the exact nanodroplet dose regimen as a mild physiological response (drop in cardiac rate, granuloma formation) was observed after ADV. Significance. These findings underline the potential of phase-change ultrasound contrast agents for in vivo proton range verification and provide the next step towards eventual clinical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".