Microstructural characterization of interfaces between cold sprayed copper and electrodeposited copper corrosion barrier coatings for used nuclear fuel containers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copper coatings on steel, manufactured by a novel combination of two different manufacturing technologies , electrodeposition and cold spraying, are employed as a corrosion barrier in the current design of used fuel containers (UFCs) for the long-term storage of Canada's used nuclear fuel. This study examines such copper coatings on a prototype container section, with a particular focus on the interface region where copper materials fabricated by the two processes converge. Distinct microstructures for the electrodeposited and cold sprayed copper layers were observed. An unexpected recrystallized layer on top of electrodeposited copper was identified for the first time. Local annealing at 350 °C and 600 °C for one hour resulted in more homogeneous microstructures and Vickers hardness profiles among the copper layers, which is favorable for this application by reducing processing related heterogeneity in the interface region. More homogenized structures with high fractions of special grain boundaries in this region are expected to provide enhanced mechanical and corrosion properties .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".