MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402740655 · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132066

Statistical characteristics of aquitard hydraulic conductivity, specific storage and porosity

2024· article· en· W4402740655 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Zhuang, Long Yan, Xingxing Kuang, Hongbin Zhan, Walter A. Illman, Zhi Dou, Zhifang Zhou, Jinguo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic conductivityPorosityAquiferGeologySpecific storageGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceConductivityHydrology (agriculture)GroundwaterGroundwater rechargePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Laboratory experiments tend to result in lower aquitard K and higher aquitard S s . • Elastic S s is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s. • For ϕ below 0.25, aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ and decrease vice versa. • Inelastic S s generally corresponds to ϕ > 0.37 and elastic S s to ϕ < 0.37. • ϕ outperforms other factors in predicting S s and is significant for predicting K. Aquitard hydraulic conductivity ( K ), specific storage ( S s ) and porosity ( ϕ ) are critical to the modeling of flow and mass and heat transport in groundwater systems, yet comprehensive insights into their statistical characteristics remain limited. This study compiles 456 K values from 47 studies, 202 S s values from 49 studies and 239 ϕ values from 18 studies, followed by rigorous statistical analysis of aquitard K , S s and ϕ with dependence on the features of test method, lithology and burial depth. Additionally, the interrelationships among K , S s and ϕ are analyzed. A predictive model for aquitard K and S s is developed utilizing the random forest (RF) approach. The statistical findings unearth that laboratory experiments tend to yield lower K while higher S s , particularly when burial depths are less than 50 m. Clay, silt clay, and glacial till exhibit comparable K values, in contrast to significantly lower K values observed in shale formations. Aquitard K , S s , and ϕ exhibit depth-decaying characteristics. Between two adjacent depth intervals, 0 – 50 m, 50 – 150 m and >150 m, there is nearly an order of magnitude difference in either K or S s . Aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ when ϕ is below 0.25 and decreases vice versa. This phenomenon is probably attributed to the significant amount of immobile-bound water adhering to clayey particles within the aquitard with a high ϕ value, which reduces the pore space available for water flow. Elastic S s , which indicates recoverable aquitard groundwater depletion, is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s , which indicates permanent aquitard groundwater depletion, implying that the majority of groundwater depletion from aquitards under long-term groundwater exploitation is non-recoverable. The RF-based predictive model indicates that ϕ is a highly important feature for predicting K and outperforms lithology, test method and burial depth in predicting S s . The statistical findings of this study present a valuable basis for aquitard hydraulic parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HydrologySame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207