Effects of sensorimotor delays and muscle force capacity limits on the performance of feedforward and feedback control in animals of different sizes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Animals rely on feedforward and feedback control for perturbation responses. When comparing terrestrial mammals of different sizes, we generally find that several features that affect perturbation responses change-larger animals have longer sensorimotor time delays, heavier body segments, and proportionally weaker muscles. We used simple computational models to study how control of fast perturbation responses is constrained by two limitations-sensorimotor delays and muscle force capacity-as a function of animal size. We developed two tasks representing common perturbation response scenarios in animal locomotion: a distributed mass pendulum approximating swing limb repositioning (swing task), and an inverted pendulum approximating whole body posture recovery (posture task). First, we used a normalized feedback control system to show how feedback response times can either be limited by the force generation capacity of muscles (force-limited), or by sensorimotor delays which constrain the maximum feedback gains that can be used to produce stable responses (delay-limited). Next, we used more detailed scaled models which represent the full size range of terrestrial mammals and parameterized the sensorimotor delays, maximum muscle forces, and inertial properties using scaling relationships from literature. Across animal size and in both tasks, we found that feedback control was primarily delay-limited-the fastest responses used a fraction of the available muscle force capacity. We compared feedback control to the fastest feedforward control strategy, and found that feedforward control response times were about four times faster than feedback control in the smallest animals, and around two times faster in the largest animals. For rapid perturbation responses, feedback control appears ineffective for terrestrial mammals of all sizes, as our simulated fastest response times exceeded available movement times. Thus, feedforward control strategies-including anticipatory adjustments, ballistic motor programs, and exploitation of intrinsic musculoskeletal dynamics-may be essential for reacting quickly to sudden and large perturbations in terrestrial mammals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".