MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402742600 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2024.3466246

Bandwidth and Task Flow Control in Stochastic Relay-Assisted MEC

2024· article· en· W4402742600 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Hajipour, Amin Mohajer, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilUniversity of Tabriz
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Computer networkTask (project management)Bandwidth allocationFlow control (data)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter studies stochastic Multi-hop Mobile Edge Computing (MMEC), where a Relay Node (RN) receives tasks from the users and randomly decides to assign them to its own computing server or to offload them to one of the multiple Higher-level computing Nodes (HNs). We take into account the waiting times in the computation and transmission queues and present the system Average Response Time (ART) in terms of offloading probabilities and links’ bandwidths. Based on that, we aim at minimizing the system ART by joint optimization of the task flow distribution among the RN/HNs and the bandwidth allocation among the links. We analyze the formulated problem and prove it is multi-convex. Moreover, we derive the closed-form expressions for the links’ bandwidths when the offloading probabilities are fixed, and based on the presented analysis and insights, we propose effective solution methods. Numerical results reveal the promising performance of the proposed methods in efficient use of the resources and reduction of the ART.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207