MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402742625 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2024.3466297

Application of Dynamic Detailed Thermal Hydraulic Model on a Transformer With Zig-Zag Winding Scale Model

2024· article· en· W4402742625 on OpenAlexaff
Marko Novković, Federico Torriano, Patrick Picher

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerScale modelElectromagnetic coilAutotransformerEngineeringElectrical engineeringThermalMechanical engineeringDistribution transformerVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the detailed dynamic thermal-hydraulic network model (THNM) for liquid-immersed power transformers (LIPT). Detailed static THNMs are prevalent in thermal design practice, but detailed dynamic THNM have not yet reached an adequate technology readiness level (TRL). Dynamic THNM describes local heat transfer and hydraulic phenomena in detail, integrating them into a global model of the complete transformer, which can be used for real-time applications. Consequently, a dynamic THNM provides a good foundation for creating a digital twin module of the transformer's transient thermal behavior during real grid operation. The paper explains the advanced detailed dynamic THNM and points out the differences from other existing approaches. It also describes the details of the model application to an experimental setup closely resembling a real transformer. The calculation results are compared with the experimental results and an error below 1.85 K in steady-state and 3.23 K after the first hour period from the cold start is observed for the discs’ temperature. This study also shows that the execution time is shorter than the real thermal transient process, which is a criterion required for real-time applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207