AI-enabled CT-guided end-to-end quantification of total cardiac activity in 18FDG cardiac PET/CT for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) plays a central role in diagnosing and managing cardiac sarcoidosis. We propose a fully automated pipeline for quantification of [18F]FDG PET activity using deep learning (DL) segmentation of cardiac chambers on computed tomography (CT) attenuation maps and evaluate several quantitative approaches based on this framework. Methods: We included consecutive patients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT for suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. DL segmented left atrium, left ventricular(LV), right atrium, right ventricle, aorta, LV myocardium, and lungs from CT attenuation scans. CT-defined anatomical regions were applied to [18F]FDG PET images automatically to target to background ratio (TBR), volume of inflammation (VOI) and cardiometabolic activity (CMA) using full sized and shrunk segmentations. Results: A total of 69 patients were included, with mean age of 56.1 ± 13.4 and cardiac sarcoidosis present in 29 (42%). CMA had the highest prediction performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.919, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858 - 0.980) followed by VOI (AUC 0.903, 95% CI 0.834 - 0.971), TBR (AUC 0.891, 95% CI 0.819 - 0.964), and maximum standardized uptake value (AUC 0.812, 95% CI 0.701 - 0.923). Abnormal CMA (≥1) had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity 65% for cardiac sarcoidosis. Lung quantification was able to identify patients with pulmonary abnormalities. Conclusion: We demonstrate that fully automated volumetric quantification of [18F]FDG PET for cardiac sarcoidosis based on CT attenuation map-derived volumetry is feasible, rapid, and has high prediction performance. This approach provides objective measurements of cardiac inflammation with consistent definition of myocardium and background region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".