MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402745168 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102916

Novel adaptive fuzzy control for pendubot with actuator faults and uncertainties: Design and experiments

2024· article· en· W4402745168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersQuỹ Đổi mới sáng tạo VingroupTập đoàn Vingroup - Công ty CP
KeywordsActuatorControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Fuzzy logicAdaptive controlControl engineeringComputer scienceFuzzy control systemEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendubot has been widely applied as a benchmark platform for control research and education. In this paper, a novel adaptive fuzzy hierarchical sliding mode controller (AFHSMC) is proposed for the pendubot under actuator faults and uncertainties. The proposed controller is designed by combining hierarchical sliding mode control (HSMC), fuzzy logic control (FLC), and balancing composite motion optimization. The proposed controller preserves many advantages such as having a straightforward structure, simple implementation, chattering reduction, and high precision and robustness. The stability of the proposed controller is ensured by using the Lyapunov approach. To verify the control performance, various numerical simulations and experiments are conducted on a pendubot under conditions that involve actuator faults and uncertainties. Compared to the conventional HSMC and FHSMC controllers, the proposed AFHSMC improves by 0.43% and 0.38% for tracking precision of the first link's angle estimate, 3.26% and 0.08% for the second link's angle estimate when influenced by uncertainties, as well as 65.23% and 12.24% for the first link, 83.95% and 16.15% for the second link when influenced by faults. • The proposed approach integrates HSMC and FLCs to tune the sliding gain and approximate uncertainties. • The BCMO method is proposed for optimizing the proposed controller, hence it is simple and easy to implement. • The proposed AHSMC controller offers advantages like simplicity, chatter-free operation, and high precision. • The proposed controller outperforms both HSMC and FHSMC in simulations and experiments on the pendubot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it