<i>SMART MRS</i> : A Simulated MEGA-PRESS Artifacts Toolbox for GABA-edited MRS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose To create a Python-based toolbox to simulate commonly occurring artifacts for single voxel Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data. Methods The toolbox was designed to maximize user flexibility and contains artifact, applied, input/output (I/O), and support functions. The artifact functions can produce spurious echoes, eddy currents, nuisance peaks, line broadening, baseline contamination, linear frequency drifts, and frequency and phase shift artifacts. Applied functions combine or apply specific parameter values to produce recognizable effects such as lipid peak and motion contamination. I/O and support functions provide additional functionality to accommodate different kinds of input data (MATLAB FID-A .mat files, nifti-mrs files), which vary by domain (time vs. frequency), collection type (edited vs. non-edited) and scale. Results Users may provide some or all of the required artifact function parameter values which will result in artifacts of different appearances. Visual assessment confirms the resemblance of simulated compared to in vivo produced artifacts. Conclusion Our pip installable Python artifact simulated toolbox SMART_MRS is meant to enhance the diversity and quality of existing simulated edited-MRS data and is complementary to existing MRS simulation software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".