Transient Notch Activation Converts Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Towards a Purkinje Fiber Fate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cardiac Purkinje fibers form the most distal part of the ventricular conduction system. They coordinate contraction and play a key role in ventricular arrhythmias. While many cardiac cell types can be generated from human pluripotent stem cells, methods to generate Purkinje fiber cells remain limited, hampering our understanding of Purkinje fiber biology and conduction system defects. To identify signaling pathways involved in Purkinje fiber formation, we analyzed single cell data from murine embryonic hearts and compared Purkinje fiber cells to trabecular cardiomyocytes. This identified several genes, processes, and signaling pathways putatively involved in cardiac conduction, including Notch signaling. We next tested whether Notch activation could convert human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to Purkinje fiber cells. Following Notch activation, cardiomyocytes adopted an elongated morphology and displayed altered electrophysiological properties including increases in conduction velocity, spike slope, and action potential duration, all characteristic features of Purkinje fiber cells. RNA-sequencing demonstrated that Notch-activated cardiomyocytes undergo a sequential transcriptome shift, which included upregulation of key Purkinje fiber marker genes involved in fast conduction such as SCN5A, HCN4 and ID2, and downregulation of genes involved in contractile maturation. Correspondingly, we demonstrate that Notch-induced cardiomyocytes have decreased contractile force in bioengineered tissues compared to control cardiomyocytes. We next modified existing in silico models of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using our transcriptomic data and modeled the effect of several anti-arrhythmogenic drugs on action potential and calcium transient waveforms. Our models predicted that Purkinje fiber cells respond more strongly to dofetilide and amiodarone, while cardiomyocytes are more sensitive to treatment with nifedipine. We validated these findings in vitro , demonstrating that our new cell-specific in vitro model can be utilized to better understand human Purkinje fiber physiology and its relevance to disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".