DetSegDiff: A joint periodontal landmark detection and segmentation in intraoral ultrasound using edge-enhanced diffusion-based network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with malocclusion require an orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan based on the severity of their condition. Assessing and monitoring changes in periodontal structures before, during, and after orthodontic procedures is crucial, and intraoral ultrasound (US) imaging has been shown a promising diagnostic tool in imaging periodontium. However, accurately delineating and analyzing periodontal structures in US videos is a challenging task for clinicians, as it is time-consuming and subject to interpretation errors. This paper introduces DetSegDiff, an edge-enhanced diffusion-based network developed to simultaneously detect the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and segment alveolar bone structure in intraoral US videos. An edge feature encoder is designed to enhance edge and texture information for precise delineation of periodontal structures. Additionally, we employed the spatial squeeze-attention module (SSAM) to extract more representative features to perform both detection and segmentation tasks at global and local levels. This study used 169 videos from 17 orthodontic patients for training purposes and was subsequently tested on 41 videos from 4 additional patients. The proposed method achieved a mean distance difference of 0.17 ± 0.19 mm for the CEJ and an average Dice score of 90.1% for alveolar bone structure. As there is a lack of multi-task benchmark networks, thorough experiments were undertaken to assess and benchmark the proposed method against state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection and segmentation individual networks. The experimental results demonstrated that DetSegDiff outperformed SOTA approaches, confirming the feasibility of using automated diagnostic systems for orthodontists. • DetSegDiff, a diffusion-based network for joint CEJ detection and alveolar bone segmentation in intraoral ultrasound videos. • An edge feature encoder is designed to enhance edge and texture information. • The SSAM module is integrated to capture local and global relationships in noisy ultrasound data. • Experiments show DetSegDiff’s superiority in alveolar bone level measurement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".