Donor-derived bartonellosis in solid organ transplant recipients from unhoused donors in Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bartonella quintana infection is rarely described to be transmitted through solid organ transplant (SOT). We report a cluster of using donor-derived B quintana infection and the attack rate from Bartonella seropositive donors. In this retrospective study of SOT recipients that received an organ from an unhoused deceased donor (UDD) in Alberta in 2022-2023, serology testing for Bartonella was performed indirect immunofluorescent assay on UDDs and recipients of UDDs with positive serology. Titers ≥1:64 were considered positive. During the study period, 31/32 UDDs were tested for immunoglobulin G to Bartonella (20 negative, 11 positive for B quintana and/or B henselae). Thirty-two organs were transplanted from the 11 seropositive donors. Six SOT recipients developed bartonellosis secondary to B quintana (4 SOT recipients received organs from 3 seropositive donors, and 2 SOT recipients from 1 UDD with no stored sample for testing). The attack rate for clinical disease from positive donors was 12.5% (4/32). The main presentation was skin nodules/papules (median 5.5 months) with bacillary angiomatosis in 4/6. Bartonella serology was positive in 5/6 SOT recipients (initially negative in 2) and blood B quintana quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 1. None had visceral involvement. All donors had history of substance use. This outbreak of bartonellosis reinforces the potential for unexpected donor-transmitted infections. Clinicians should be aware of high transmission of B quintana through transplant from infected UDDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".