Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the publication of ZwischenWelten,Juli Zeh'smost recent novel, co-authored with Simon Urban,the author once again was omnipresent in German media while the novel itself topped the bestseller charts.Zeh'subiquitous presenceinthe literary landscape finds itself matched by increasings cholarlya ttention.In 2021,t he venerable journal TEXT+KRITIK published its first issue dedicated to the work of Zeh, entitled Divergenzen des Schreibens and edited by Klaus Schenk and Christina Rossi.Amere twoyears later,this new volume, edited by Heinz-Peter Preuer, is furthert estament to the ongoing scholarlyi nterest in Zeh'sw ork.Despite its shortness -thei ssue barelyc rosses the one-hundred-pagem ark -the volume does not lack in scope.Itsn ine essays cover aspects rangingf rom narratology to adaptation to literary awards,and, not surprisingly,given Zeh'sacademic training in law, the relationship between literature and law.The aforementioned scope of topics finds its echo in the diverse approaches the individual authors take in their analyses.Stephen Brockmann dedicates his essayt ot he question of how liberalismi sc onceptualized in Zeh'sn ovels, while Agnes Mueller,acousinofthe author,chooses to write her analysis of the blurring of textual boundaries in Unterleuten in the form of apersonal letter,thus referencing Zeh'sown poetics lecture Treideln from 2013.Other contributions venture into previouslyunexplored scholarlyterritory,like Sarah Maa in her essayonawards and their implication for Zeh'sp osition in the literary field, or Heinz-Peter Preuer'saptlytitled "Ungeheures,Unerhrtes," an examination of plot twists thatcovers the entirety of Zeh'soeuvresofar.Michael Tteberg, in turn, focuses on adap-tationsofZeh'ssecond novel Spieltrieb for the stageaswell as the big and the small screen, of which aBrazilian television series from 2013, AMenina sem Qualidades, is arguablyt he least known and therefore the most surprising discovery.M atteo Galli, in his critical essayd edicated to the representation of rural East Germany, takes Zeh'sruminations on kitsch, as outlinedinTreideln,and applies them to Unterleuten and ber Menschen,w hereas Michael Vauthc onnects thed ystopian aspects of Zeh'sw riting by bringingi nto dialogue Spieltrieb, Corpus Delicti,a nd Leere Herzen.What emergesi sakaleidoscopic picture of Zeh'swork that affirms, adds, and expands previouslye xisting scholarship on the prominent author.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".