Newly discovered Early Cretaceous Au mineralization overprinting Late Jurassic Pb-Zn-Ag mineralization in the Qin-Hang metallogenic belt (South China)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Magmatic and mineralizing events in South China were traditionally thought to be limited between 150 Ma and 130 Ma despite the numerous Mesozoic-aged magmatic-hydrothermal deposits in the region. This viewpoint is being reevaluated in light of new age data. Kangjiawan is a representative Pb-Zn-Ag-Au deposit in the Hengyang Basin in the Qin-Hang metallogenic belt of South China that contains 1.96 Mt of Pb-Zn resource with 4.70% Zn, 6.02% Pb; 2280.5 t of Ag resource with 108.23 g/t of Ag; and 58 t of Au resource with 3.25 g/t of Au. Its mineralization can be divided into four stages: (I) pre-ore quartz–pyrite, (II) quartz–pyrite–galena–sphalerite, (III) quartz–galena–sphalerite, and (IV) calcite–pyrite. Multiple generations of pyrite were identified at Kangjiawan. Generation I pyrite (Py1, formed in Stage I) is coarse-grained, texturally homogeneous, and contains abundant silicate inclusions (e.g., K-feldspar and titanite). Generation II pyrite (Py2, formed in Stage II) is generally fine-grained and exhibits a core-rim texture, with the porous, sphalerite–galena inclusion-bearing core (Py2a) having replaced Py1 and the rim (Py2b) being homogeneous. Generation III pyrite (Py3, formed in Stage IV) is subdivided into Py3a and Py3b, with the homogeneous Py3a often replaced by the porous Py3b. The low Co/Ni ratio of Py1, along with the abundant silicate inclusions, is suggestive of intense fluid-rock interaction during Stage I. Py2a is As-Cu-Pb-Ag-Au–rich, Co-depleted, and has elevated Ag/Co (average 3.24) and As/Co (average 10,217.14) ratios, which are suggestive of extensive fluid boiling during the formation of Py2a. This is also supported by the ubiquitous Py2-cemented hydrothermal breccia. In contrast, Py2b is depleted in As-Cu-Pb-Ag-Au but enriched in Co, which is indicative of non-boiling conditions. Subsequent sealing of fractures by veins may have caused the formation of coarse-grained sphalerite and galena in Stage III. The similar 207Pb/206Pb values among Py1 (average 0.849), Stage II galena (average 0.849), Stage III galena (average 0.849), and the nearby Shuikoushan granodiorite stock (corrected average 0.848) suggests that mineralization in stages I–III may represent distal skarn-type Pb-Zn-Ag mineralization genetically related to the Shuikoushan stock. This interpretation is supported by the similar ages of mineralization Stage I (apatite U-Pb: 159.4 ± 1.0 Ma) and Stage II (fuchsite 40Ar-39Ar: 158.1 ± 0.4 Ma) to the age of Shuikoushan stock (zircon U-Pb age: ca. 158 Ma). As the primary Au-hosting mineral at Kangjiawan, the As- and Au-rich Py3a occurs in sharp contact with porous Co-Ni-Se-Bi-Mo-As–poor Py3b, which commonly contains abundant fine-grained galena and sphalerite inclusions. This suggests that Py3b formed via coupled dissolution–re-precipitation of Py3a. This coupled dissolution–re-precipitation reaction favors the remobilization of Au from within the Py3a structure and its re-enrichment as Au inclusions in Py3b; this is supported by the anomalous Au peaks in time-resolved signal profiles from laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and the abundant outliers for Au concentrations in Py3b. The markedly distinct trace-element geochemistry of Py3 compared to those of Py1 and Py2, and the U-Pb age of Stage IV calcite (ca. 138 Ma), are indicative of an Early Cretaceous Au mineralization event. Published calcite C-O isotope data, coupled with the narrow range of δ34S values (0.6‰–2.2‰) of Py3, suggest that the Kangjiawan Au mineralization may be associated with a concealed Early Cretaceous pluton. We propose that the Kangjiawan deposit formed via the overprinting of Late Jurassic distal skarn Pb-Zn-Ag mineralization by Early Cretaceous magmatic-hydrothermal Au mineralization, which demonstrates that 150–135 Ma may also be an important period for the formation of the magmatic-hydrothermal mineralization belt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".