MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402762166 · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyae155

Admixture in the fungal pathogen <i>Blastomyces</i>

2024· article· en· W4402762166 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gaston I. Jofre, Andrius J. Dagilis, Victoria E. Sepúlveda, Tayte Anspach, Ashutosh Singh, Anuradha Chowdhary, Daniel R. Matute

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsBlastomycesBiologyBlastomyces dermatitidisPhylogenetic treePhylogeneticsMinionGenomeEvolutionary biologyGeneticsFungal pathogenPathogenBlastomycosisGeneNanopore sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blastomyces is an emerging primary fungal pathogen that affects patients worldwide. The evolutionary processes that have resulted in the current diversity in the genus remain largely unexplored. We used whole genome sequences from 99 Blastomyces isolates, including two sequenced in this study using long-read technologies, to infer the phylogenetic relationships between Blastomyces species. We find that five different methods infer five different phylogenetic trees. Additionally, we find gene tree discordance along the genome with differences in the relative phylogenetic placement of several species of Blastomyces, which we hypothesize is caused by introgression. Our results suggest the urgent need to systematically collect Blastomyces samples around the world and study the evolutionary processes that govern intra- and interspecific variation in these medically important fungi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207