Loss of PMR4 callose synthase results in salicylic acid-independent and broad-spectrum resistance to clubroot in <i>Arabidopsis</i> and <i>Brassica napus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The clubroot disease caused by protist Plasmodiophora brassicae is one of the most important diseases of Brassica crops. Growing clubroot-resistant cultivars remains the most effective and practical approach to managing clubroot disease. However, resistance gene-mediated immunity is rapidly overcome in the field when new pathotypes arise. In this study, we identified PMR4 as a potential gene target for creating a novel clubroot-resistant source. Recessive PMR4 mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana conferred broad-spectrum resistance to multiple P. brassicae pathotypes, independent of salicylic acid-mediated plant immunity. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-editing was employed to create mutations in two PMR4 orthologs in the B. napus genome, and resulting homozygous mutants exhibited dual resistance to powdery mildew and clubroot. PMR4 is required for the callose deposition at wound and powdery mildew infection sites in leaves. This study reveals that callose deposition in roots is induced by P. brassicae infection and requires PMR4. It appears that the clubroot disease progression is arrested at the primary-to-secondary infection phase in pmr4-1 mutants. Together, this study demonstrates that PMR4 -encoded callose synthase is a host susceptibility factor required for P. brassicae to complete its life cycle, and that PMR4 can be targeted against both powdery mildew and clubroot diseases in Brassica crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".