MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402784606 · doi:10.1134/s0965545x23600333

Nucleation Density from Isotropic and Self-Nucleated Melts of Isotactic Polystyrene: An Overview from the Molten to a Glassy State

2024· article· en· W4402784606 on OpenAlexaff
Al Mamun, Abbas Ghanbari, Mohammadreza Nofar

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Science Series A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneNucleationTacticityMaterials scienceIsotropySupercoolingThermodynamicsChemical engineeringChemical physicsCrystallographyComposite materialPolymerChemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nucleation density is a fundamental parameter influencing the microstructure, properties, and performance of polymeric materials. Controlling and manipulating nucleation density allows for tailoring polymeric materials with specific characteristics, enabling advancements in various fields of industrial applications. The present study investigates nucleation density from an isotropic and self-nucleated melt of isotactic polystyrene (iPS). A wide range of temperatures, from 225 to 260°C are considered, and the samples are subjected to partial or isotropic melt followed by isothermal crystallization. In the case of partial melting below 230°C, the nucleation density is attributed to the seed nuclei originating from self-nucleated melts due to incomplete crystal melting. Crystallization from isotropic melts involves a limited number of heterogeneous nucleation sites activated on the surfaces, impurities, or foreign particles within the melt. On the other hand, crystallization from the glassy state was found to rely on the molecular conformation and mobility in the amorphous phase, which plays a crucial role in achieving an optimal nucleation density. The experimental findings indicate that in molten and glassy states, the predetermined active nucleus sites significantly influence the nucleation process during crystallization. The nucleation density directly affects the crystallization kinetics and morphology of crystals. A higher nucleation density leads to a more significant number of smaller crystals, resulting in a finer microstructure. This can have significant implications for polymer properties such as mechanical strength, optical transparency, electrical conductivity, permeability, and thermal properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Science Series ASame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207