Semantic Segmentation-Driven Integration of Point Clouds from Mobile Scanning Platforms in Urban Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precise and complete 3D representations of architectural structures or industrial sites are essential for various applications, including structural monitoring or cadastre. However, acquiring these datasets can be time-consuming, particularly for large objects. Mobile scanning systems offer a solution for such cases. In the case of complex scenes, multiple scanning systems are required to obtain point clouds that can be merged into a comprehensive representation of the object. Merging individual point clouds obtained from different sensors or at different times can be difficult due to discrepancies caused by moving objects or changes in the scene over time, such as seasonal variations in vegetation. In this study, we present the integration of point clouds obtained from two mobile scanning platforms within a built-up area. We utilized a combination of a quadruped robot and an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The PointNet++ network was employed to conduct a semantic segmentation task, enabling the detection of non-ground objects. The experimental tests used the Toronto 3D dataset and DALES for network training. Based on the performance, the model trained on DALES was chosen for further research. The proposed integration algorithm involved semantic segmentation of both point clouds, dividing them into square subregions, and performing subregion selection by checking the emptiness or when both subregions contained points. Parameters such as local density, centroids, coverage, and Euclidean distance were evaluated. Point cloud merging and augmentation enhanced with semantic segmentation and clustering resulted in the exclusion of points associated with these movable objects from the point clouds. The comparative analysis of the method and simple merging was performed based on file size, number of points, mean roughness, and noise estimation. The proposed method provided adequate results with the improvement of point cloud quality indicators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".