Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les villes du patrimoine mondial sont contraintes de s’adapter à de nombreux et nouveaux défis au 21e siècle. L’arrondissement historique du Vieux-Québec, inscrit sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial de l’UNESCO depuis 1985, sert de point de départ à une étude holistique de son patrimoine. Cette recherche entend adopter une méthodologie inédite, en employant un cadre d’analyse qui applique les six étapes de l’approche du paysage urbain historique (PUH) pour interroger sa situation actuelle et la manière dont la Ville de Québec met en place une approche patrimoniale inclusive et durable pour s’adapter aux nouveaux défis urbains. Suite à une enquête menée auprès de résidents, les résultats mettent en lumière les dynamiques entre les différents acteurs concernés par ce quartier classé, la pertinence du concept du PUH, et la redéfinition opérée par la Ville de Québec pour une gestion inclusive et durable de son patrimoine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".