Optimising resource-constrained fleet selective maintenance with asynchronous maintenance breaks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper offers a novel and significant extension of the Fleet Selective Maintenance Problem (FSMP) by considering asynchronous maintenance breaks and resource-constrained maintenance planning. This constitutes a significant shift from the conventional focus on synchronous breaks for the FSMP formulated to plan maintenance for fleets of mission-critical systems. This paper establishes a theoretical link between the Selective Maintenance Problem (SMP) and the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP). The proposed FSMP formulation for asynchronous breaks is more general and versatile in adapting to a broad spectrum of operational constraints and resource scarcities. Numerical experiments are conducted that highlights the trade-offs between the timing and quality levels of maintenance activities and the consumption of resources that maintenance planners can make to obtain the best system performance for the budget and maintenance windows available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it