MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adiabatic expansion cooling of antihydrogen

2024· article· en· W4402796995 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Ahmadi, B. X. R. Alves, Chris Baker, W. Bertsche, A. Capra, S Cohen, C. Torkzaban, C. L. Cesar, M. Charlton, R. Collister, S. Eriksson, A. Evans, N. Evetts, J. Fajans, T. Friesen, M. Fujiwara, P. Granum, J. S. Hangst, M. E. Hayden, D. Hodgkinson, C. A. Isaac, M. A. Johnson, Stephen A. Jones, S. Jonsell, N. Kalem, N. Madsen, D. Maxwell, J. T. K. McKenna, S. Menary, Takamasa Momose, J. J. Munich, K. Olchanski, Å. Olin, P. Pusa, C. Ø. Rasmussen, F. Robicheaux, R. L. Sacramento, M. Sameed, E. Sarid, D. M. Silveira, C. So, G. Stutter, T. D. Tharp, R. I. Thompson, D. P. van der Werf, J. S. Wurtele

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLeverhulme TrustFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceIsrael Science FoundationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoU.S. Department of EnergyCarlsbergfondetNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyTRIUMFScience and Technology Facilities CouncilFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsAntihydrogenPhysicsAdiabatic processAtomic physicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsAntimatterLeptonElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetically trapped antihydrogen atoms can be cooled by expanding the volume of the trap in which they are confined. We report a proof-of-principle experiment in which antiatoms are deliberately released from expanded and static traps. Antiatoms escape at an average trap depth of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>0.08</a:mn> <a:mo>±</a:mo> <a:mn>0.01</a:mn> <a:mspace width="0.28em"/> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">K</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> (statistical errors only) from the expanded trap while they escape at average depths of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mn>0.22</d:mn> <d:mo>±</d:mo> <d:mn>0.01</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:math> and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:mn>0.17</e:mn> <e:mo>±</e:mo> <e:mn>0.01</e:mn> <e:mspace width="0.28em"/> <e:mi mathvariant="normal">K</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:math> from two different static traps. (We employ temperature-equivalent energy units.) Detailed simulations qualitatively agree with the escape times measured in the experiment and show a decrease of <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mrow> <h:mn>38</h:mn> <h:mo>%</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:math> (statistical <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mtext>error</i:mtext> <i:mo>&lt;</i:mo> <i:mn>0.2</i:mn> <i:mo>%</i:mo> </i:mrow> </i:math> ) in the mean energy of the population after the trap expansion without significantly increasing antiatom loss compared to typical static confinement protocols. This change is bracketed by the predictions of one-dimensional and three-dimensional semianalytic adiabatic expansion models. These experimental, simulational, and model results are consistent with obtaining an adiabatically cooled population of antihydrogen atoms that partially exchanged energy between axial and transverse degrees of freedom during the trap expansion. This result is important for future antihydrogen gravitational experiments which rely on adiabatic cooling, and it will enable antihydrogen cooling beyond the fundamental limits of laser cooling. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207