MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 3D photon-to-digital converter readout for low-power and large-area applications

2024· article· en· W4402797214 on OpenAlexaffabout
T. Rossignol, N. Roy, Samuel Parent, K. Deslandes, F. Nolet, Serge A. Charlebois, J.‐F. Pratte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)PhotonElectrical engineeringAnalog-to-digital converterPhysicsUltra low powerComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceOpticsPower consumptionEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new trend in large area noble liquid experiments is to measure the scintillation light with photodetectors and their electronics inside the active volume. Compared to the typical approach of using silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) with an analog readout chain leading to an analog-to-digital converter, this paper presents a new 3D photon-to-digital converter (PDC) readout that takes advantage of the binary nature of the single-photon avalanche diodes (SPAD). The readout contains 4096 pixels over 25 mm 2 , each including a 3D bonding pad and a quenching circuit. The readout features three different outputs: a fast flag to get the timestamp of each event from an external time-to-digital converter, a digital sum to retrieve the number of pixels triggered during an event, and an analog monitor to generate an analog SiPM-like output. The analog monitor is also used to validate the two former digital outputs. The readout also includes 61 2D CMOS SPADs for validation purpose prior to the final 3D integration with SPADs custom made according to our design by Teledyne DALSA (Bromont, Canada). As a first system integration toward large-area detector applications, a mini-tile of 2 × 2 readouts has been developed to test all the functionalities. The measured single-photon timing resolution ranges from 72 to 93 ps FWHM across the mini-tile SPAD channels population (i.e. 4 × 61 channels). The flag timing resolution is below 95 ps RMS, which includes the contribution of the optimized flag H-tree but also an additional trigger tree that replaces the 3D SPAD array at this stage of development. Once bonded with the 3D SPADs, the trigger tree won't be required to measure the flag timing resolution. With the removed contribution of the trigger tree, the estimated flag timing resolution should be below 45 ps RMS. The extent of the benefits of the digital sum output depend on the application, and this paper focuses on two cases. First, a low-power coincidence scheme such as required by the nEXO liquid xenon experiment, leading to a power consumption as low as 140 μ W per PDC. With a finer sampling of the scintillation light such as required for pulse shape discrimination in liquid argon, the power consumption remains below 100 μ W per PDC. Overall, this readout is designed as a replacement for a typical analog SiPM chain, without compromise on the performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207