Enhancing Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification with Lightweight Quantized CNNs and Federated Learning on ABIDE-1 Dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition that presents significant diagnostic challenges due to its varied symptoms and nature. This study aims to improve ASD classification using advanced deep learning techniques applied to neuroimaging data. We developed an automated system leveraging the ABIDE-1 dataset and a novel lightweight quantized one-dimensional (1D) Convolutional Neural Network (Q-CNN) model to analyze fMRI data. Our approach employs the NIAK pipeline with multiple brain atlases and filtering methods. Initially, the Regions of Interest (ROIs) are converted into feature vectors using tangent space embedding to feed into the Q-CNN model. The proposed 1D-CNN is quantized through Quantize Aware Training (QAT). As the quantization method, int8 quantization is utilized, which makes it both robust and lightweight. We propose a federated learning (FL) framework to ensure data privacy, which allows decentralized training across different data centers without compromising local data security. Our findings indicate that the CC200 brain atlas, within the NIAK pipeline’s filt-global filtering methods, provides the best results for ASD classification. Notably, the ASD classification outcomes have achieved a significant test accuracy of 98% using the CC200 and filt-global filtering techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this performance surpasses previous studies in the field, highlighting a notable enhancement in ASD detection from fMRI data. Furthermore, the FL-based Q-CNN model demonstrated robust performance and high efficiency on a Raspberry Pi 4, underscoring its potential for real-world applications. We exhibit the efficacy of the Q-CNN model by comparing its inference time, power consumption, and storage requirements with those of the 1D-CNN, quantized CNN, and the proposed int8 Q-CNN models. This research has made several key contributions, including the development of a lightweight int8 Q-CNN model, the application of FL for data privacy, and the evaluation of the proposed model in real-world settings. By identifying optimal brain atlases and filtering methods, this study provides valuable insights for future research in the field of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".