<i>S</i> timulus-modulated <i>a</i> pproach to <i>s</i> teady- <i>s</i> tate: A new paradigm for event-related fMRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies discard the initial volumes acquired during the approach of the magnetization to its steady-state value. Here, we leverage the higher temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) of these initial volumes to increase the sensitivity of event-related fMRI experiments. To do this, we introduce Acquisition Free Periods (AFPs) that allow for the full recovery of the magnetization, followed by task or baseline acquisition blocks (AB) of fMRI volumes. An appropriately placed stimulus in the AFP produces a Blood Oxygenation-Level-Dependent (BOLD) response that peaks during the initial high tSNR phase of the AB, yielding up to a ∼50% reduction in the number of trials needed to achieve a given statistical threshold relative to conventional fMRI. The silent AFP can be exploited for the presentation of auditory stimuli or uncontaminated electrophysiological recording and its variable duration allows aperiodic stimulus or response-locked signal averaging as well as gating to physiology or motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".