MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402802231 · doi:10.2166/wpt.2024.243

Electrodialysis reversal (EDR) technology: a viable solution for addressing water quality challenges in the dry zone, Sri Lanka

2024· article· en· W4402802231 on OpenAlex
Dushan Darshana Walawege, W. S. B. Wickramasingha, R.D.C. Sandaruwan, Samitha Udayanga, I. J. J. U. N. Perera, N. M. S. K. Nawalage, Dharma Dassanayake, B. K. A. Bellanthudawa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Practice & Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSri lankaDry zoneElectrodialysisWater qualityEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementQuality (philosophy)Environmental engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental planningChemistryEngineeringMembraneBiologyEcologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology (CKDu) affects rural Sri Lankan agricultural populations, with poor-quality ground and surface water suspected as the root cause. Hence, we conducted this study to explore the effectiveness of Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) technology in treating water quality issues related to CKDu in dry zone of Sri Lanka. The EDR plant in Kahatagasdigiliya, Anuradhapura district, managed by the National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWS&DB) was selected. We measured both physical (colour, turbidity, pH) and chemical (electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, chloride, alkalinity, hardness, nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, fluoride, total phosphate, iron, manganese) parameters of the EDR process. The parameters of the permeate stage of the EDR plant were validated by comparison with data from SLS 614:2013, and removal efficiencies were assessed. The results revealed that all parameters consistently fell within the permissible limits in the permeate stage of the EDR plant. Turbidity (62.65%), sulfate and manganese (50%), colour (47.37%), fluoride (44.19%), and hardness (35.71%) showed high removal efficiencies in the EDR process. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of EDR technology in addressing water quality challenges, validating its potential for groundwater treatment and this contributes to the improvement of groundwater quality in CKDu-prevalent areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it