MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402803626 · doi:10.1364/josab.534286

Cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy in the molecular fingerprint region using free-running quantum cascade lasers

2024· article· en· W4402803626 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Charles R. Markus, Jakob Hayden, Daniel I. Herman, Philip A. Kocheril, Douglas Ober, Termeh Bashiri, Markus Mangold, Mitchio Okumura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramHertz FoundationH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsArnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
KeywordsCascadeLaserSpectroscopyQuantum cascade laserFingerprint (computing)Dual (grammatical number)QuantumMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsChemistryComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy promises broadband, high-resolution, and highly sensitive spectroscopic measurements on sub-millisecond time scales, making it highly attractive for trace gas monitoring. In this work, we demonstrate cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy in the molecular fingerprint region using two quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) operating as optical frequency combs centered at 1063cm −1 spanning 56cm −1 . The high-finesse bow-tie cavity provided a 285 m effective path length, and the high power-per-mode of the QCL combs granted a strong multi-heterodyne signal of the swept-cavity transmission. This ultimately resulted in a noise equivalent absorption per spectral element of 1.8×10 −9 cm −1 Hz −1/2 , when considering the active measurement time. Measurements of the ν 8 fundamental band of methanol determined concentrations as low as 1.3 ppm in a single shot, which were captured in a 15 ms sweep of the cavity PZT. The detection limit after averaging 30 measurements was 20 ppb, which took 450 ms in measurement time and 70 s in wall time. This demonstrates the potential of cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy in challenging applications such as free radical kinetics and environmental monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207