MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402806567 · doi:10.1109/tii.2024.3453190

Electric Vehicle Switching Attacks Against Subsynchronous Stability of Power Systems

2024· article· en· W4402806567 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmadreza Abazari, Khaled Sarieddine, Mohsen Ghafouri, Danial Jafarigiv, Ribal Atallah, Chadi Assi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsElectric power systemAutomotive engineeringElectric vehicleStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Computer sciencePower (physics)EngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deployment of electric vehicles (EVs) requires the integration of information and communication technologies, making power grids prone to cyber threats from EV cyber-infrastructure. On this basis, this paper studies the impact of a new family of EV-based load-altering attacks (EV-LAA) against the subsynchronous stability of the power grid. First, the cyber-physical connections between the EV ecosystem and the power grid are discussed to represent a threat model for coordinated electric vehicle switching attacks (EVSAs) that can excite torsional modes of the system. Then, it will be demonstrated that a traditional proportional-integral (PI)-based subsynchronous resonance damping controller (SSRDC) cannot stabilize the power grid. With the help of a customized unknown input observer (UIO), an adaptive control framework is developed based on a model predictive control (MPC). This framework can generate online control signals and add them to the internal control framework of the synchronous generators (SGs). A modified IEEE Second Benchmark (M-IEEE-SBM) is used to demonstrate the EV-LAAs' consequences and evaluate the effectiveness of the developed adaptive technique. The proposed strategy is also studied through real-time simulations under a testbed that integrates a virtual sphere (vSphere) for an EV ecosystem with power grids simulated in a real-time simulator (i.e., OPAL-RT 5650). To demonstrate the feasibility of this switching attack vector in an actual power system and its impact on SSR stability, the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) is also simulated in this real-time simulator, and the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive control framework is validated under the EV-LAAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207